Improved heat shock method for extracting total RNA from nasopharyngeal swab samples even with low viral load.

This study aimed to improve the heat shock method as a cost-effective and time-efficient for total RNA extraction. We compared the effectiveness of two total RNA extraction methods by using Real-Time PCR for nasopharynx swabs. Include: I; use of a commercial total RNA extraction kit as a standard. II; utilized a modified heat shock method (MHS). Time, centrifuge speed and duration, proteinase K, and RNA carrier were optimized. The optimized parameters included treating the sample with 5 µg/µL at 56°C for 5 minutes, heating at 95°C for 5 minutes followed by thermal shock in ice for 3 minutes, adding 4 µg/µL RNA carrier at room temperature for 3 minutes, and centrifuging at 7000 rpm for 10 minutes. This optimization demonstrated a sensitivity and specificity of 100% (CI: 95%) even in samples with low viral load. Our in-house method presents a rapid, and cost-effective alternative for total RNA extraction.

Evaluation of a rapid Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) test for the laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections.

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have seen a considerable increase in the last years and given the health burden they may represent from both a personal and community perspective, they require surveillance and prevention programmes based on a timely and decentralized diagnosis. In this context, user-friendly rapid molecular tests may represent a good trade-off between diagnostic accuracy, accessibility and affordability. In this study we evaluated the diagnostic performance of a new real-time LAMP (Loop Mediated Isothermal Amplification) method for the rapid detection and differentiation of 7 major sexually transmissible pathogens by analysing real clinical samples (genital and extra-genital matrices) from individuals with suspected STIs. The assay showed good overall diagnostic performances in terms of sensitivity, specificity and concordance with a gold-standard PCR-based molecular method. This assay, not requiring specialised laboratory technicians or expensive instrumentation, but nonetheless capable of guaranteeing accurate results, is within the reach of outpatient settings, obstetrics, and gynaecology clinic, hence ensuring on-field access to early diagnosis.

Clinical validation of RCSMS: A rapid and sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a test for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva.

Peru's holds the highest COVID death rate per capita worldwide. Key to this outcome is the lack of robust, rapid, and accurate molecular tests to circumvent the elevated costs and logistics of SARS-CoV-2 detection via RT-qPCR. To facilitate massive and timely COVID-19 testing in rural and socioeconomically deprived contexts, we implemented and validated RCSMS, a rapid and sensitive CRISPR-Cas12a test for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 from saliva. RCSMS uses the power of CRISPR-Cas technology and lateral flow strips to easily visualize the presence of SARS-CoV-2 even in laboratories with limited equipment. We show that a low-cost thermochemical treatment with TCEP/EDTA is sufficient to inactivate viral particles and cellular nucleases in saliva, eliminating the need to extract viral RNA with commercial kits, as well as the cumbersome nasopharyngeal swab procedure and the requirement of biosafety level 2 laboratories for molecular analyses. Notably, RCSMS performed outstandingly in a clinical validation done with 352 patients from two hospitals in Lima, detecting as low as 50 viral copies per 10 µl reaction in 40 min, with sensitivity and specificity of 96.5% and 99.0%, respectively, relative to RT-qPCR. The negative and positive predicted values obtained from this field validation indicate that RCSMS can be confidently deployed in both high and low prevalence settings. Like other CRISPR-Cas-based biosensors, RCSMS can be easily reprogrammed for the detection of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. We conclude that RCSMS is a fast, efficient and inexpensive alternative to RT-qPCR for expanding COVID-19 testing capacity in Peru and other low- and middle-income countries with precarious healthcare systems.

Comparative evaluation of assay performance for SARS-CoV-2 detection in animal oral samples, lung homogenates, and phosphate-buffered saline using the TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit.

A One Health approach has been key to monitoring the COVID-19 pandemic, as human and veterinary medical professionals jointly met the demands for an extraordinary testing effort for SARS-CoV-2. Veterinary diagnostic laboratories continue to monitor SARS-CoV-2 infection in animals, furthering the understanding of zoonotic transmission dynamics between humans and animals. A RT-PCR assay is a primary animal screening tool established within validation and verification guidelines provided by the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD), World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH), and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). However, differences in sample matrices, RNA extraction methods, instrument platforms, gene targets, and cutoff values may affect test outcomes. Therefore, targeted validation for a new sample matrix used in any PCR assay is critical. We evaluated a COVID-19 assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in feline and canine lung homogenates and oral swab samples. We used the commercial Applied Biosystems MagMAX Viral/Pathogen II (MVP II) nucleic acid isolation kit and TaqPath COVID-19 Combo kit, which are validated for a variety of human samples, including nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swab samples. Our masked test showed a high detection rate and no false-positive or false-negative results, supporting sample extension to include feline oral swab samples. Our study is a prime example of One Health, illustrating how a COVID-19 assay designed for human testing can be adapted and used to detect SARS-CoV-2 in oral swab samples from cats and likely dogs, but not lung homogenates.

Evaluation of the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 assay PCR test for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests are commonly utilized in commercial settings but pose challenges due to labor-intensive procedures and extended response times during peak demand. In contrast, real-time fluorescence and isothermal amplification assays using Crossing Priming Amplification (CPA) offer faster genetic material analysis, eliminate subjectivity, and require less manipulation and personnel training. This study aimed to validate the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 Assay, a diagnostic kit based on CPA, using oral and nasopharyngeal samples. The EasyNAT kit was compared to the Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 kit, evaluating 873 samples obtained during routine analysis at the Microbiology Laboratory of the Hospital Costa del Sol (Marbella, Spain). The overall sensitivity and specificity for the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 Assay were 79.1% (95%CI 74.5-83.7) and 99.5% (95%CI 98.7-100), respectively; with, validity index of 91.9%, positive predictive value of 98.9%, negative predictive value of 88.9%, positive likelihood ratio of 144.5, negative likelihood ratio of 0.21 and a total Youden Index of 0.79. Notably, sensitivity improved in fresh samples (91.4%), along with a high Youden Index (0.91). The EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 Assay achieved a higher percentage of concordance in positive samples with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 when analyzing cycle threshold (Ct) intervals below 30 compared to intervals equal or greater than 30, and demons. In conclusion, the EasyNAT SARS-CoV-2 Assay demonstrated high sensitivity and agreement with Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2, particularly in fresh samples or when the signal was detected at Ct intervals below 30, indicating higher viral loads. This makes it suitable for rapid screening in various settings, including those with limited access to conventional molecular laboratory setting.

The diagnostic accuracy of the ID NOW COVID-19 point of care test in acute hospital admissions.

BACKGROUND: Prompt identification of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on admission to hospital is crucial to ensuring initiation of appropriate treatment, optimising infection control and maintaining patient flow. The Abbott ID NOW™ COVID-19 assay (ID NOW) is a point-of-care, isothermal nucleic acid amplification test, capable of producing a result within minutes, potentially placing it as an invaluable tool in helping to control the coronavirus-disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ID NOW in acute hospital admissions. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective approach to data collection was undertaken in consecutive patients with ID NOW and Hologic Aptima™ SARS-CoV-2 transcription-mediated amplification assay (Aptima TMA) results, across three hospitals in the south-west of England between 1st March and 30th September 2021. A nasal swab was taken for ID NOW and a combined nose and throat swab for Aptima TMA. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for ID NOW against Aptima TMA. This study was conducted during a period of alpha and delta strain predominance. RESULTS: 19,698 ID NOW assays were performed, of which 12,821 had an Aptima TMA assay performed within 24 hours. ID NOW had sensitivity of 85.2 % (95 % CI, 82.2-87.9) and specificity of 99.6 % (95 % CI, 99.4-99.7) compared with the reference assay. The overall PPV was 91.0 % (95 % CI, 88.5-93.0) and the overall NPV was 99.3 % (95 % CI, 99.1-99.4). CONCLUSIONS: ID NOW offers a valid diagnostic tool to detect SARS-CoV-2, performing comparably to a reference laboratory-based assay which takes longer to provide results.

The importance of using WHO International Standards to harmonise SARS-CoV-2 serological assays.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to the rapid development of tests to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 infection and ascertain the prevalence of infection, along with the formulation of various treatments and vaccines. Globally, over 220 anti-SARS-CoV-2 serological assays have been developed for laboratory use, and many of these assays are currently used to assess immune responses against SARS-CoV-2. However, because these assays were independently developed by different manufacturers with different target antigens, immunoglobulin detection, technologies, and data reporting approaches, the results are not directly comparable, making it challenging to draw conclusions regarding immune responses at the population level. With deficiencies in assay validation, standardisation, and harmonisation, the inability to use and compare large datasets is becoming a major issue as serological data continue to increase. To help in addressing this issue, WHO established the first International Standard for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin in late 2020. In this Personal View, we define the WHO International Standard for the anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin, summarise the uses of primary versus secondary serology standards, recommend the use of such standards for data harmonisation, and list guidance and resources for using serology standards to improve data comparability.

An Open One-Step RT-qPCR for SARS-CoV-2 detection.

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in millions of deaths globally, and while several diagnostic systems were proposed, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) remains the gold standard. However, diagnostic reagents, including enzymes used in RT-PCR, are subject to centralized production models and intellectual property restrictions, which present a challenge for less developed countries. With the aim of generating a standardized One-Step open RT-qPCR protocol to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA in clinical samples, we purified and tested recombinant enzymes and a non-proprietary buffer. The protocol utilized M-MLV RT and Taq DNA pol enzymes to perform a Taqman probe-based assay. Synthetic RNA samples were used to validate the One-Step RT-qPCR components, demonstrating sensitivity comparable to a commercial kit routinely employed in clinical settings for patient diagnosis. Further evaluation on 40 clinical samples (20 positive and 20 negative) confirmed its comparable diagnostic accuracy. This study represents a proof of concept for an open approach to developing diagnostic kits for viral infections and diseases, which could provide a cost-effective and accessible solution for less developed countries.

SARS-CoV-2 infections among pregnant women, 2020, Finland-Cross-testing of neutralization assays.

We studied the development of the severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic in southern Finland in 2020 and evaluated the performance of two surrogate immunoassays for the detection of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs). The data set consisted of 12 000 retrospectively collected samples from pregnant women in their first trimester throughout 2020. All the samples were initially screened for immunoglobulin G (IgG) with SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody assay (EIM-S1, Euroimmun) followed by confirmation with nucleocapsid antibody assay (Architect SARS-CoV-2, Abbott). Samples that were reactive (positive or borderline) with both assays were subjected to testing with commercial surrogate immunoassays of NeutraLISA (EIM) and cPassTM (GenScript Biotech Corporation) by using pseudoneutralization assay (PNAbA) as a golden standard. No seropositive cases were detected between January and March. Between April and December, IgG (EIM-S1 and Abbott positive) and NAb (PNAbA positive) seroprevalences were between 0.4% and 1.4%. NeutraLISA showed 90% and cPass 55% concordant results with PNAbA among PNAbA negative samples and 49% and 92% among PNAbA positive samples giving NeutraLISA better specificity but lower sensitivity than cPass. To conclude, seroprevalence in pregnant women reflected that of the general population but the variability of the performance of serological protocols needs to be taken into account in inter-study comparison.

High quality of SARS-CoV-2 molecular diagnostics in a diverse laboratory landscape through supported benchmark testing and External Quality Assessment.

A two-step strategy combining assisted benchmark testing (entry controls) and External Quality Assessments (EQAs) with blinded simulated clinical specimens to enhance and maintain the quality of nucleic acid amplification testing was developed. This strategy was successfully applied to 71 diagnostic laboratories in The Netherlands when upscaling the national diagnostic capacity during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The availability of benchmark testing in combination with advice for improvement substantially enhanced the quality of the laboratory testing procedures for SARS-CoV-2 detection. The three subsequent EQA rounds demonstrated high quality testing with regard to specificity (99.6% correctly identified) and sensitivity (93.3% correctly identified). Even with the implementation of novel assays, changing workflows using diverse equipment and a high degree of assay heterogeneity, the overall high quality was maintained using this two-step strategy. We show that in contrast to the limited value of Cq value for absolute proxies of viral load, these Cq values can, in combination with metadata on strategies and techniques, provide valuable information for laboratories to improve their procedures. In conclusion, our two-step strategy (preparation phase followed by a series of EQAs) is a rapid and flexible system capable of scaling, improving, and maintaining high quality diagnostics even in a rapidly evolving (e.g. pandemic) situation.

APS calculator: a data-driven tool for setting outcome-based analytical performance specifications for measurement uncertainty using specific clinical requirements and population data.

OBJECTIVES: According to ISO 15189:2022, analytical performance specifications (APS) should relate to intended clinical use and impact on patient care. Therefore, we aimed to develop a web application for laboratory professionals to calculate APS based on a simulation of the impact of measurement uncertainty (MU) on the outcome using the chosen decision limits, agreement thresholds, and data of the population of interest. METHODS: We developed the "APS Calculator" allowing users to upload and select data of concern, specify decision limits and agreement thresholds, and conduct simulations to determine APS for MU. The simulation involved categorizing original measurand concentrations, generating measured (simulated) results by introducing different degrees of MU, and recategorizing measured concentrations based on clinical decision limits and acceptable clinical misclassification rates. The agreements between original and simulated result categories were assessed, and values that met or exceeded user-specified agreement thresholds that set goals for the between-category agreement were considered acceptable. The application generates contour plots of agreement rates and corresponding MU values. We tested the application using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data, with decision limits from relevant guidelines. RESULTS: We determined APS for MU of six measurands (blood total hemoglobin, plasma fasting glucose, serum total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and total folate) to demonstrate the potential of the application to generate APS. CONCLUSIONS: The developed data-driven web application offers a flexible tool for laboratory professionals to calculate APS for MU using their chosen decision limits and agreement thresholds, and the data of the population of interest.

Overview of the different methods for RNA preparation in COVID-19 diagnosis process during the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic brought to light the impact of a widespread disease on various aspects of human relationships, communities, and economies. One notable consequence was the increased demand for diagnostic kits, laboratory reagents, and personal health equipment. This surge in testing capacity worldwide led to shortages in the supply of essential items, including RNA extraction kits, which are crucial for detecting COVID-19 infections. To address this scarcity, researchers have proposed alternative and cost-effective strategies for RNA extraction, utilizing both chemical and physical solutions and extraction-free methods. These approaches aim to alleviate the challenges associated with the overwhelming number of tests being conducted in laboratories. The purpose of this review is intends to provide a comprehensive summary of the various kit-free RNA extraction methods available for COVID-19 diagnosis during the pandemic.

Home testing for SARS-CoV-2 and impact on surveillance in New York State.

PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections by testing modality (at-home rapid antigen [home tests] versus laboratory-based tests in clinical settings [clinical tests]), assess factors associated with clinical testing, and estimate the true total number of diagnosed infections in New York State (NYS). METHODS: We conducted an online survey among NYS residents and analyzed data from 1012 adults and 246 children with diagnosed infection July 13-December 7, 2022. Weighted descriptive and logistic regression model analyses were conducted. Weighted percentages and prevalence ratios by testing modality were generated. The percent of infections diagnosed by clinical tests via survey data were synthesized with daily lab-reported results to estimate the total number of diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infections in NYS July 1-December 31, 2022. RESULTS: Over 70% of SARS-CoV-2 infections in NYS during the study period were diagnosed exclusively with home tests. Diagnosis with a clinical test was associated with age, race/ethnicity, and region among adults, and sex, age, and education among children. We estimate 4.1 million NYS residents had diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 infection July 1-December 31, 2022, compared to 1.1 million infections reported over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: Most SARS-CoV-2 infections in NYS were diagnosed exclusively with home tests. Surveillance metrics using laboratory-based reporting data underestimate diagnosed infections.

Quality of the sample-based RNA determines the real-time RT-PCR results in the laboratory diagnosis of COVID-19.

Effect of the quality of sample-based RNA on COVID-19 real-time RT-PCR results was investigated. The purity of the extracts was dependent on the extraction method (P<0.0001) and affected the test interpretations (P = 0.002). Gross RNA concentration negatively correlated with Ct values (P < 0.0001). The presence of impurities contributed to inconclusive test results.

Comparison of RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR assays for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in the extracted RNA and direct swab samples.

Rapid detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in infected patients is critical for infection control. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) has been demonstrated to be a rapid, simple, reliable, cost-effective and sensitive method to detect SARS-CoV-2 in a variety of samples in considerably less time than Real-Time PCR. In this study, we developed and optimized a rapid detection method for SARS-CoV-2 based on RT-LAMP method utilizing a specific primer set targeting the ORF1a gene and then examined its sensitivity and efficiency using a serially diluted viral RNA sample with a known concentration. Furthermore, the sensitivity of the RT-LAMP to detect SARS-CoV-2 in direct swab samples with varying Ct values were compared to a commercial molecular RT-qPCR based detection kit. According to our findings the optimal incubation time for RT-LAMP assay was 45 min. There was a complete agreement between RT-LAMP and RT-qPCR in diagnosing the viral genome in the diluted extracted RNA sample. However, it had a lower sensitivity (71%) to detect the viral genome in direct swab samples compared to RT-qPCR. In conclusion, due to its simplicity, rapidness, sensitivity, and specificity, RT-LAMP has tremendous potential as a point-of-care tool; nevertheless, more research is needed to utilize it for detecting SARS-CoV-2, particularly in direct swab samples.

Analytical performance of the Abbott ID NOW 2.0 assay for SARS-CoV-2 detection in clinical samples from symptomatic patients.

We evaluated the analytical performance of ID NOW™ COVID-19 2.0 assay versus conventional real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using a total of 792 clinical samples from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs, stored in frozen universal transport medium samples. Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement of ID NOW were 97.6 % and 100 %, respectively. The overall percent agreement between ID NOW and RT-PCR was 99.5 %. The PPA of ID NOW in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in 164 RT-PCR positive patients, all of whom had symptoms related COVID-19, was 97.1 % within 8 days since symptom onset, 97.9 % from 8 to 14 days since symptom onset, and 97.6 % after 14 days since symptom onset, with no significant difference between the days since symptom onset. The ID NOW assay demonstrated good performance, providing a rapid and randomly accessible alternative to conventional RT-PCR for timely SARS-CoV-2 detection, particularly in situations requiring rapid results for patient care.

SARS-CoV-2 emergency use authorization published sensitivity differences do not correlate with positivity rate in a hospital/reference laboratory setting.

During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic skyrocketing demand for testing in the United States, coupled with supply chain issues, necessitated the use of multiple SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing platforms at many health centers. At our institution these platforms consisted of 8 ordered services for sample triage, using 9 emergency use authorized (EUA) SARS-CoV-2 RNA nucleic acid amplification tests resulting in 10 possible ordered service/EAU combinations. Here we review the results of the first ∼2.9 million samples tested and note the variability in positivity rates. We conclude that differences in reported limit of detection did not translate to differences in positivity rate or show correlation to discordant results observed. This highlights the importance of balancing patient testing capacity needs with the desire to have more sensitive tests.

Amplification Failure by the Cepheid Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 Assay due to a Single-Nucleotide Variant of the N Gene in the Omicron Variant.

BACKGROUND: Rapid identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection using molecular testing has played an important role in preventing the spread of COVID-19. However, the failure of SARS-CoV-2 N gene amplification in the Cepheid Xpert SARS-CoV-2 assay could lead to the failed detection of infections, possibly leading to spread. In this study, we examined N gene amplification failure due to a single-nucleotide variant (SNV) in the N2 region of the gene. METHODS: Xpert assay results obtained at our hospital since March 2021 were retrospectively reviewed and samples with strong E gene and failed N gene amplification were selected. Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina platform. Lineage analyses were conducted and the N2 target region of the US CDC 2019-nCoV real-time PCR primer sequence, used in PCR assays of SARS-CoV-2 infection, was compared with the reference SARS-COV-2 sequence (Wuhan-Hu-1, NC_045512.2). RESULTS: The two samples eligible for this study were classified as BA.5.2 (22B, Omicron) and included two synony-mous SNVs, C29197T and C29200T, respectively. Both variants resulted in synonymous mutation of the N gene encoding alanine. The distribution of variants varied across different countries. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical laboratories performing molecular tests targeting the N gene of SARS-CoV-2 should consider the probability of N gene amplification failure when reporting the test results.

Real-world evaluation of the Lucira Check-It COVID-19 loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) test.

IMPORTANCE: In hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic, laboratory testing was important to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmissions, while facilitating patient flow in the emergency department and pre-operative settings, and allowing for the safe return to work of exposed healthcare workers. Delayed test results from laboratory nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) posed a barrier to maximizing efficient patient flow and minimizing staffing shortages. This quality improvement project sought to evaluate the analytical and clinical performance of the Lucira Check-It COVID-19 Test, a point-of-care test that used NAAT technology, in the perioperative setting, emergency department, and community testing sites. We found the Lucira Check-It to have comparable performance to laboratory NAATs. It can be employed with little training for specimen collection, processing, and interpretation, and at a cost justifiable from the resources saved from avoiding sample transport and laboratory testing.

Optimization of extraction-free protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection using a commercial rRT-PCR assay.

In the ongoing global fight against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the sample preparation process for real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) faces challenges due to time-consuming steps, labor-intensive procedures, contamination risks, resource demands, and environmental implications. However, optimized strategies for sample preparation have been poorly investigated, and the combination of RNase inhibitors and Proteinase K has been rarely considered. Hence, we investigated combinations of several extraction-free protocols incorporating heat treatment, sample dilution, and Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors, and validated the effectiveness using 120 SARS-CoV-2 positive and 62 negative clinical samples. Combining sample dilution and heat treatment with Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors addition exhibited the highest sensitivity (84.26%) with a mean increase in cycle threshold (Ct) value of + 3.8. Meanwhile, combined sample dilution and heat treatment exhibited a sensitivity of 79.63%, accounting for a 38% increase compared to heat treatment alone. Our findings highlight that the incorporation of Proteinase K and RNase inhibitors with sample dilution and heat treatment contributed only marginally to the improvement without yielding statistically significant differences. Sample dilution significantly impacts SARS-CoV-2 detection, and sample conditions play a crucial role in the efficiency of extraction-free methods. Our findings may provide insights for streamlining diagnostic testing, enhancing its accessibility, cost-effectiveness, and sustainability.